We connect product data, run multi-channel lifecycle programs, and measure what worked.
Migration, Data model mapping, Parallel run, Transition
We rebuild your programs in Customer.io and transition without interruptions.
• Audit of the existing engagement platform
• Data model mapping
• Journey and template rebuild
• Parallel run across both platforms
• IP and domain warmup
• Post-launch monitoring
Migrate from: Iterable, Braze, Marketo, Klaviyo, HubSpot, Salesforce Marketing Cloud, Intercom, and Mailchimp
Implementation, Workspace architecture, Deliverability
Stalled implementations are usually a data model problem, not a scheduling problem. We build the structure so it holds up once your team starts shipping.
• Data model design: people, objects, and relationships
• Workspace and environment structure
• Sending domain and subdomain setup
• Deliverability foundation
• Permissions and governance
Data layer, Event schema, Pipelines, CDP
This is the foundation to a strong behavior-based lifecycle program.
• Event schema design
• Warehouse and pipeline architecture
• CDP integration: Hightouch, Segment, RudderStack
Program design & build, Creative ops, Multivariate testing
We map the golden path, design the triggers, and build the programs. Then we build the layer that makes it repeatable, so the team ships without a build queue.
Behavior-based programs, across five stages
• Activation and onboarding
• Free-to-paid conversion
• Expansion and upsells
• Churn prevention
• Winbacks and recovery
Creative operations
• Reusable Liquid components
• Dynamic content blocks
• Modular drag and drop design system
• AI-assisted multivariate testing
522% increase in trial user activation. Scout OS.
Multi-channel, In-app, Push, SMS/MMS, Webhooks
Multi-channel is one of the main reasons a PLG company picks Customer.io. Most teams use a fraction of it.
• In-app messages
• Push
• SMS and MMS
• Webhooks
• Transactional
Ongoing management, Optimization, Scale
We own the engagement layer on a continuous cycle, and keep the instance healthy while we do it.
Running it
• Roadmap
• Builds and QA
• Optimization and reporting
• Implementation sprints that add journeys as your product evolves
Keeping it healthy
• Journey and campaign inventory
• Dead flow retirement
• Segment and profile hygiene
• Message volume and cost review
• Inbox placement and reputation
Measurement, HoldoutS, Incrementality, Attribution
Reporting that ties lifecycle programs to ARR instead of opens and clicks.
• Holdout design
• Incrementality testing
• Warehouse-side attribution
• Product analytics: Mixpanel, Amplitude, PostHog
Events named and structured so any program can use them.
Most data models are added a feature at a time, by whoever shipped the feature. That leaves three names for the same action, properties that exist on some events and not others, and signals that mean different things depending on which team instrumented them. Lifecycle work then starts with a week of figuring out what an event really means before anything can be built on it.
We define the event schema around the moments that matter in the lifecycle: activation, conversion, habit, expansion, risk. Every event arrives with consistent naming and the properties a program needs to act on it. New campaigns reuse what’s already built instead of submitting a request for new tracking.
Product data should reach Customer.io in minutes, without an engineering ticket.
Most lifecycle teams can describe the program they want but can’t build it, because user behavior that should trigger each touch point is sitting in a warehouse without a path into the engagement platform. So the idea gets shelved, or it ships as a time-based drip that's the same for every single user. That’s the gap between behavior-based lifecycle that drives incremental revenue and what’s in place today.
We architect data models and Hightouch syncs that move product behavior into Customer.io continuously. Trial milestones, usage thresholds, account-level signals, all available as attributes and events in days. We shape data models around lifecycle strategy, so each user moves through a journey built on what they did in product.
Clean data is what lets a lifecycle program scale.
Programs trigger when they should, the right users get the right message, and nobody is checking sends before they go out. That’s the difference between running six programs and running two hundred and six. Most teams cap lifecycle pograms not because they’re out of ideas, but because they don’t fully trust what’s feeding the triggers, logic, and personalization.
We validate every event, field, and identity lifecycle programs depend on before launch, then keep validating as the product and the journeys change. Deduplicated profiles, consistent event naming, and alerts when a signal stops syncing. A broken trigger surfaces in hours, not a quarter later, because we’re the partner running programs that depend on it.
Outsourced Lifecycle Team
Structure
Monthly recurring retainer.
Scope
We become your dedicated lifecycle marketing infrastructure unit.
Best for
Teams that need a permanent partner to own the attributed revenue.
Implementation Sprints
Structure
Fixed scope, short timeline.
Scope
A high-intensity overhaul to build your V1 stack, fix broken pipelines, or launch your essential lifecycle flows.
Best for
Early-stage startups needing a fast infrastructure build or migration.
Technical Support
Structure
Ad-hoc support.
Scope
Unblock specific engineering issues. Complex logic, deliverability audits, schema design reviews.
Best for
Teams with internal marketers who get stuck on complex technical hurdles.
Jobs 04, 05, 06, 07
Jobs 01, 02, 03
Any single job
We'll point you to a partner who works in your platform.
That's a freelancer or a specialist designer. We'll refer you to someone we trust.
Additional details you may want to know.
Yes, and it's most of what we do. We audit what's there, keep what works, retire what doesn't, and document the data model before we get started.
It depends on profile volume, journey and template count, data quality, and third-party integrations. We give you a timeline during the assessment, before you commit to anything.
Good ones handle creative and campaign execution well. The question is whether they can build the orchestration layer. Most can write emails but can't engineer the event schemas and CDP integrations that make behavior-first messaging work. So the part that actually blocks you is still sitting in the engineering queue.
Internal teams have context and continuity we'll never match. What they don't have is engineering capacity, because they're competing with the product roadmap, and product wins. That's structural, not a people problem. We bring our own engineering layer so your team can own strategy and brand.
You could, but most data engineers build analytics and dashboards for internal stakeholders, not marketing pipelines tuned for ESPs and CDPs. They speak SQL, not Customer.io. That hybrid skillset is hard to find.
Those are good at optimizing delivery, send times, and basic personalization. They work with the data you've managed to get into the platform. The constraint isn't the AI, it's what's feeding it. We build the layer underneath.
We build. Automations, segments, templates, Liquid, integrations, and the data pipelines. The strategy exists to direct the build, not to replace it.
Our process is built to protect it. IP and domain warmup, staged sending, and inbox placement testing before and after.
Yes. Plenty of teams want to own their own data model. We scope around the pieces you'd rather keep in-house.
Yes. We can cut over one program at a time, or wait and do a full switch. That's a decision we make together during planning.
Read-only access to your current stack, a list of the programs that matter most, and someone who can answer questions about the data model. That's enough for the assessment.
Read-only access, an independent review of the setup, and findings back within a week. If we're not the right partner, we'll tell you and point you somewhere better.